On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 10:53:30 -0500 William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> >> Howbout a --with-experimental-timedlocks config option ? > > > > +1 > > > > although anyone toggling an -experimental flag is expected > > to understand their resulting apr breaks binary compatibility. > > Or... do we stub them in all as APR_ENOTIMPL if the experimental > flag is not given? Sounds like a plan. Keep API/ABI compatible either way, get the new code some exposure, but only among users who ticked the disclaimer! -- Nick Kew
