On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 4:40 AM, Nick Kew <n...@apache.org> wrote: > I think we've done most of 1.6.0, modulo a couple of questionmarks. > > Potentially open issues are (in no particular order): > 1. Mark timedlocks experimental
The underlying question which we haven't resolved, and which our discussion didn't draw out enough opinions/voices, boils down to this simple question... [ ] Release 1.x may include experimental features, disabled by default [ ] Release 1.x may include experimental features, enabled by default [ ] Releases don't include experimental features My underlying assumption is that toggling from experimental to release would occur in release 1.(x+1), but that's yet another discussion based on the outcome of this straightforward poll. .
