On May 19, 2017 2:21 PM, "William A Rowe Jr" <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
[ ] Release current svn _timedlock API implementation in 1.6 This seems to be the only questionable item remaining, and this vote (and an enhancement may be vetoed, AIUI) is very distinct from the poll on experimental features. Please vote, thanks. I was hoping for more responses, we have a few worried but non-blocking opinions on this thread to set aside timedlock for one more version minor. We don't have an explicit +1, and as I understand it, CTR suggests that reviews *are* done. But after-the-fact once they have been committed. I'd really like to see several +1's from those who have spent the time to review the code and are confident in it. We have decided experimental isn't a thing in apr releases, so I will revert Nick's default-disabled patch today, but I'd like to let this vote run one more day to ensure we didn't miss opinions AFK over this past weekend. At this point we don't have a +1 from even the submittor. That's disturbing. Again, please vote today, even if it is not an entire >= ±1
