On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 6:35 PM Stefan Sperling <s...@stsp.name> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 02:09:51PM -0500, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > I find no errors in our APR_TIME -> APR_INT64 determination, and > > made no such changes. > > > > But I note httpd 2.4.x commit r1824504 by Yann made a correction in > > this sphere. Are you testing the current code or an old 2.4 release? > > If it is the release, please retest using 2.4.x branch? > > I tried httpd trunk as of r1855812. > > I doubt this time_t format problem is new. I likely never noticed > it before because it is getting drowned by all the off_t errors. > According to my observations, apr_time_t should match the APR_TIME_T_FMT token in every case. Please inspect that line of httpd code to see how some non-apr_time_t value was passed in APR_TIME_T_FMT formatting. > Your diff is a great step forward in any case. > Glad this solve is working.
