On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:

>
> On 10/07/2012, at 6:00 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
> >>
> >> I think that makes sense. Do the components need to be separate
> releases, or should they just be folded in as 1.4-M3-SNAPSHOT as well since
> they are under the Archiva group?
> > currently:
> > * redback core has groupId: org.apache.archiva.redback
> > * redback components: org.apache.archiva.redback.components
> >
> > You mean only one tree of sources ?
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/archiva/trunk/
> >
> > /redback-components
> >
> /redback-core
> > ?
> >
> > Yup that could ease the release but we will release everything all the
> > time and increase build time.
>
> Good point. Maybe ok to be separate for now, but over time I anticipate
> we'd fold it in / trim it out… my other concern was to make sure it's not
> too hard for contributors to build Archiva.
>
> >
> >>
> >> Also, should the relevant parts of the red back site be folded into
> Archiva's?
> > I have started some stuff:
> > * core: http://archiva.apache.org/redback/
> > * components: http://archiva.apache.org/redback/components/
>
> I was thinking of folding in the important bits to:
> http://archiva.apache.org/docs/1.4-SNAPSHOT/adminguide/security.html
> and
> http://archiva.apache.org/ref/1.4-SNAPSHOT/
>
> Happy to work on that, just wondering if it's a good idea.
>

+1 to folding in at least the Redback configuration stuff to
/adminguide/security.html. For the development docs of Redback, maybe we
could just link to (or point devs/contributors to)
http://archiva.apache.org/redback/ and
http://archiva.apache.org/redback/components/ ?

+1 to releasing 1.4-M3 as well :)

Thanks,
Deng

Reply via email to