> > Anyone have a preference or > know of good reasons to choose one over the other? My inclination > would be to use Eclipse 3.4.
The only reason for not going with 3.4 that I can think of is that Alberio 0.0.2 and Eclipse 3.4 will cause an SWT Invlaid Thread access exception on Mac OS X. Based on the Alberio mailing list this issue has been resolved already, but they have not yet put out a new release. Brian On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Tom Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm writing up instructions on how to set up a PDE Target Environment > so that we have greater control over dependencies (as opposed to just > building against whatever plugins are in the developers Eclipse > installation). > > As part of this, we need to make an explicit choice about what Eclipse > version to support. Our last release required Eclipse 3.2. Albireo, > which is a new dependency for us, suggests 3.3 as a minimum version > although they say it might work with 3.2. Unless someones has a > strong requirement for Eclipse 3.2 support, my inclination is to make > Eclipse 3.3 the earliest supported version. Any objections? > > Since we'll be supporting both Eclipse 3.3 and 3.4 and our RCP builds > bundle all necessary components, we could theoretically choose either > version to bundle with the RCP build. Anyone have a preference or > know of good reasons to choose one over the other? My inclination > would be to use Eclipse 3.4. > > Tom > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
