>From what Tom has said I hope he might be able to help Andreas get his module working as a plugin to ArgoEclipse.
I think we should then seriously consider whether ArgoEclipse standalone should then become the the final build for argouml as it looks just the same and offers us at the very least an installer and if Tom and Andreas can get it working a plugin architecture. The talk of an abandoned roadmap for ArgoEclipse concerns me though. There is clearly new blood needed there. Where do we get it and how do we keep peole motivated? My own priorities have been to UML2 which at the moment means I'm in core ArgoUML when I can find the time (which is very little at the moment). ArgoEclipse must be the second highest priority though so we can piggy back on top of all that free architecture (undo - as Tom says - being a major one) but I'm not sure where to start in getting the eclipse knowledge even if I do get the time available. Bob. ------------------------------------------------------ http://argoeclipse.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=5521&dsMessageId=2699122 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]].
