Okay, I accept that we should wait here until we understand better what to do.
I'll could reinstate the persisters as of 0.22 but we may now have problems with those who may have saved using release 0.23.1. How concerned should I be about that? On 9/23/06, Tom Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Linus suggested: > Make and maintain a Diagram Interchange model for MOF 1.4 (or > as close to the real thing as possible). Load it into the > current version of MDR, the one we have installed. XMI and > load and save are generated from MDR with old versions. > > This would solve the file compatibility and saving and > loading problems but we still haven't made the transition to > UML 2.0 and we're still non-standard. I don't understand how this is any different from wedging PGML into XMI or any other ArgoUML proprietary approach. Swapping one proprietary approach for another has no advantage that I can see. It causes us to waste effort on an evolutionary dead end throw away piece of code, It doesn't improve interchange with other tools. It replaces a set of known problems with a new set of unknown problems. Our current proprietary approach, for all of its problems, is at least a known quantity. The only way I'd support replacing it with a different proprietary approach of our own crafting would be if it was clear that it was going to be at least two years before we could get to a standard UML 2.x Diagram Interchange. We've made due with PGML for 5+ years. Why the sudden rush to replace it with something that will have a lifetime measured in months? Tom --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
