I think this sounds like a good idea.

Some questions though...

If a user does copy'n'paste from an old diagram to a new one, will it work?
BTW, does it work in the old sequence diagrams?

        /Linus


2007/11/28, Christian López Espínola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Bob and I discussed about this and we think that some issues are
> blocker in sequence2 before a release, but we can do that work into
> the argouml
> trunk.
>
> Switching from one to other in the sequence diagram create actions
> will be simple, so if the work is not stable enough just before the
> release we can easily switch to the old implementation for the
> release.
>
> So if everybody agrees, I'll start the merging.
>
> On 11/28/07, Bob Tarling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > I'd previously suggested the replacement sequence diagrams are not
> > merged until we have a migration provided from the old diagrams to
> > new.
> >
> > I've rethought that.
> >
> > I see no reason why we couldn't merge the sequence diagrams now and
> > have the old and new diagrams side by side for some time.
> >
> > The new diagrams are defined in their own separate package and so the
> > two diagrams can live side by side in the same project.
> >
> > All we need to do is have the new sequence diagram button create the
> > new style and have no way to create the old style sequence diagrams.
> >
> > We still need to convert old style diagrams at some stage so that they
> > gain the benefits of the new ones and we don't have extra code to
> > maintain. But I don't think that need should cause any delay in
> > allowing the user to create new style sequence diagrams.
> >
> > The only difference I'm thinking when we bring across is to have this
> > new diagram as a separate subsystem under src and repackage as
> > org.argouml.sequencediagram
> >
> > Any thoughts?
> >
> > Bob.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Christian López Espínola
>

Reply via email to