Hi Jules,
If you log in, and you have the observer role, then you can change issues.
Anyhow, I will adapt the issue now with your input.
Regards.
Michiel
----- Original Message -----
From: "Grengbondai, Jules C." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 8:08 PM
Subject: RE: [argouml-dev] Shall we agree to initialise the GUI before the
Modules?
Hi Michiel,
I verified issue 4952 and it works fine. Thanks! But I do not think I have
the privilege for changing the status (or maybe I do not know how to mark it
VERIFIED).
Please close it if you can or show me how to update the status.
Thanks,
Jules
-----Original Message-----
From: Christian López Espínola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 5:31 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [argouml-dev] Shall we agree to initialise the GUI before the
Modules?
Thanks for fixing it Michiel.
With a near stable release soon, I expected to avoid this kind of
problems, and letting the modules work as them worked before.
Anyway, I feel that this is a defered issue, and we should provide an
API independent of the order of initialization.
I think that we should work on solving this as soon as the stable
release is done, so modules are independent ones from anothers.
Someone asked in a previous thread what are the values of ArgoUML. I
have been monitoring some forums, and many of them mentioned that
ArgoUML has code generation for a lot of languages. Maybe one of the
values are the possibility of writing modules, for code generation or
anything else, so we should make an effort for provide them a clear,
easy and functional API.
I hope that, once the release is done, we should discuss a way of
reaching this goal through a good design (maybe the discussion could
start before).
On Jan 14, 2008 11:16 PM, Michiel van der Wulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Tom, Jules, et al.,
>
> I just committed a new version of the Main class.
> Now we have the same initialisation sequence as before the profile stuff
was
> committed.
>
> Tested with ArgoUML standalone, with the "dev" module, and with the
> commandline in batch mode (see
> http://argouml-stats.tigris.org/documentation/quick-guide-
0.24/ch02s04.html).
> This new version needs some testing of the profiles function - please
help
> with this!
>
> Jules, does this solve your issue 4952? - If so, please put it on fixed.
>
> Regards,
> Michiel
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Grengbondai, Jules C." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
>
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 9:36 PM
> Subject: RE: [argouml-dev] Shall we agree to initialise the GUI before
the
> Modules?
>
>
> Hello all,
>
> This problem is related to issue 4952 that I reported.
> http://argouml.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4952
>
> Regards,
> Jules
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tom Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 2:55 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [argouml-dev] Shall we agree to initialise the GUI before
> the
> > Modules?
> >
> > On Jan 13, 2008 5:15 AM, Michiel van der Wulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > In the light of issue 4752, can we agree upon the following?
> > >
> > > ArgouML shall initialise the Gui BEFORE the Modules are
> initialised.
> >
> > I guess it depends on what we mean by "initialize." I think part of
> > the problem is that everyone wants to be initialized first or last and
> > that we do too much initialization too early.
> >
> > I think we should be doing:
> >
> > - lazy initialization - don't initialize things until needed
> > - run time extension - modules can add extensions whenever they want
> >
> > Having said that, in the short term, I think we need to stabilize
> > things and the best way to do that is probably to revert to the
> > initialization order that we used before the profile work was
> > introduced. Is that what your proposal does?
> >
> > Tom
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.2/1223 - Release Date:
13/01/2008
> 20:23
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Regards,
Christian López Espínola
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.2/1224 - Release Date: 14/01/2008
17:39
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
