Thanks Michiel!

Linus, would you give an observer role?

Thanks,
Jules

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michiel van der Wulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 2:37 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [argouml-dev] Shall we agree to initialise the GUI before the
> Modules?
> 
> Hi Jules,
> If you log in, and you have the observer role, then you can change issues.
> Anyhow, I will adapt the issue now with your input.
> Regards.
> Michiel
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Grengbondai, Jules C." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 8:08 PM
> Subject: RE: [argouml-dev] Shall we agree to initialise the GUI before the
> Modules?
> 
> 
> Hi Michiel,
> 
> I verified issue 4952 and it works fine. Thanks!  But I do not think I
> have
> the privilege for changing the status (or maybe I do not know how to mark
> it
> VERIFIED).
> Please close it if you can or show me how to update the status.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jules
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Christian López Espínola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 5:31 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [argouml-dev] Shall we agree to initialise the GUI before
> the
> > Modules?
> >
> > Thanks for fixing it Michiel.
> > With a near stable release soon, I expected to avoid this kind of
> > problems, and letting the modules work as them worked before.
> > Anyway, I feel that this is a defered issue, and we should provide an
> > API independent of the order of initialization.
> > I think that we should work on solving this as soon as the stable
> > release is done, so modules are independent ones from anothers.
> > Someone asked in a previous thread what are the values of ArgoUML. I
> > have been monitoring some forums, and many of them mentioned that
> > ArgoUML has code generation for a lot of languages. Maybe one of the
> > values are the possibility of writing modules, for code generation or
> > anything else, so we should make an effort for provide them a clear,
> > easy and functional API.
> > I hope that, once the release is done, we should discuss a way of
> > reaching this goal through a good design (maybe the discussion could
> > start before).
> >
> > On Jan 14, 2008 11:16 PM, Michiel van der Wulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi Tom, Jules, et al.,
> > >
> > > I just committed a new version of the Main class.
> > > Now we have the same initialisation sequence as before the profile
> stuff
> > was
> > > committed.
> > >
> > > Tested with ArgoUML standalone, with the "dev" module, and with the
> > > commandline in batch mode (see
> > > http://argouml-stats.tigris.org/documentation/quick-guide-
> > 0.24/ch02s04.html).
> > > This new version needs some testing of the profiles function - please
> > help
> > > with this!
> > >
> > > Jules, does this solve your issue 4952? - If so, please put it on
> fixed.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Michiel
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Grengbondai, Jules C." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 9:36 PM
> > > Subject: RE: [argouml-dev] Shall we agree to initialise the GUI before
> > the
> > > Modules?
> > >
> > >
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > This problem is related to issue 4952 that I reported.
> > > http://argouml.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4952
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Jules
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Tom Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 2:55 PM
> > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > Subject: Re: [argouml-dev] Shall we agree to initialise the GUI
> before
> > > the
> > > > Modules?
> > > >
> > > > On Jan 13, 2008 5:15 AM, Michiel van der Wulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > In the light of issue 4752, can we agree upon the following?
> > > > >
> > > > >     ArgouML shall initialise the Gui BEFORE the Modules are
> > > initialised.
> > > >
> > > > I guess it depends on what we mean by "initialize."  I think part of
> > > > the problem is that everyone wants to be initialized first or last
> and
> > > > that we do too much initialization too early.
> > > >
> > > > I think we should be doing:
> > > >
> > > > - lazy initialization - don't initialize things until needed
> > > > - run time extension - modules can add extensions whenever they want
> > > >
> > > > Having said that, in the short term, I think we need to stabilize
> > > > things and the best way to do that is probably to revert to the
> > > > initialization order that we used before the profile work was
> > > > introduced.  Is that what your proposal does?
> > > >
> > > > Tom
> > > >
> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.2/1223 - Release Date:
> > 13/01/2008
> > > 20:23
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> >
> > Christian López Espínola
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.2/1224 - Release Date:
> 14/01/2008
> 17:39
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to