Personally I would suggest having this development in the main argouml project as a separate eclipse project within that. The rest of our language modules are contained that way.
My reason for previously preferring separate tigris projects was to help control cyclic dependencies but work ihas since been done to control this better in the main trunk. Bob. On 19/04/2008, Thomas N. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > now I have a grammmar I'd like to work with, and I'd like to run it together > with the current Java RE. My idea is to use the argouml-java project for > this. Roadmap: > > - provide a Java module that coexists with the current Java support > - add Java RE to that new module > - later, add Java code generation and Java notation too > - in the long term, remove the current Java support code in the core > > If I understood Linus right, this is what the argouml-java project was set > up for? Is this plan feasible? Or should I do something else with the Antlr 3 > grammar? > > (What I don't want to do is to simply replace the Java RE code in my local > copy. I think it should be a separate module. BTW, I'm aware of the source > tree restructuring and the coming 0.26 version.) > > Linus, if you agree to start using the argouml-java project, then I'll apply > for developer role for it. > > Regards, > Thomas > > -- > GMX startet ShortView.de. Hier findest Du Leute mit Deinen Interessen! > Jetzt dabei sein: http://www.shortview.de/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
