Hi Bob,

there's some detailed feedback on property panels in 0.30, maybe it's also 
useful for some 0.30.1 improvement, look here:
http://www.argouml-users.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=191

@Andreas: thanks for the UML2 patch, I'll have a look. Can you create an issue 
and attach the patch to it? I have no time now. :-(

Thomas

-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:07:18 +0000
> Von: Bob Tarling <[email protected]>
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: Re: [argouml-dev] Proposal for release 0.30.1

> I had tried this and it worked for me but maybe something has broken
> it again since.
> 
> I'm concentrating on testing with UML1.4 first as that is what is
> supported for a stable release however I would like to be sure this is
> working for UML2 as well before release.
> 
> Bob
> 
> On 16 March 2010 14:14, Andreas Rueckert <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> >> Datum: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 17:36:30 +0000
> >> Von: Bob Tarling <[email protected]>
> >> An: [email protected]
> >> Betreff: Re: [argouml-dev] Proposal for release 0.30.1
> >
> >> The problem with parameters is fixed and so I think we ought to start
> >> discussing the possibility of a defect release.
> >
> > Bob did you test your fix with the euml version?
> >
> > Tried to add a parameter, but no luck so far.
> >
> > I always get this exception:
> > ==========
> > 2010-03-15 11:58:15,074 ERROR: Exception (XMLPropPanelFactory.java:112)
> > org.argouml.model.euml.NotYetImplementedException
> >        at
> org.argouml.model.euml.FacadeEUMLImpl.getRaisedSignals(FacadeEUMLImpl.java:1122)
> >        at
> org.argouml.core.propertypanels.ui.UMLOperationRaisedSignalsListModel.buildModelList(UMLOperationRaisedSignalsListModel.java:71)
> >        at
> org.argouml.core.propertypanels.ui.UMLModelElementListModel.rebuildModelList(UMLModelElementListModel.java:425)
> >        at
> org.argouml.core.propertypanels.ui.UMLModelElementListModel.setTarget(UMLModelElementListModel.java:547)
> >        at
> org.argouml.core.propertypanels.ui.UMLOperationRaisedSignalsListModel.<init>(UMLOperationRaisedSignalsListModel.java:60)
> > ...
> > ==========
> >
> > , so I checked the sources:
> >
> > ==========
> >   1121     public Collection getRaisedSignals(Object handle) {
> >   1122         throw new NotYetImplementedException();
> >   1123     }
> >   1124
> >   1125     public Collection getRaisedExceptions( Object handle) {
> >   1126         if (handle instanceof Operation) {
> >   1127             return
> ((Operation)handle).getRaisedExceptions();
> >   1128         }
> >   1129         return null;
> >   1130     }
> > ==========
> >
> > I guess, the raised exceptions are in fact the raised signals in
> > UML2, so the body of the getRaisedExceptions method could be
> > copied to getRaisedSignals so far?
> >
> > Ciao,
> > Andreas
> >
> > --
> > GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
> > Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------
> >
> http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=2460565
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail:
> [[email protected]].
> > To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator,
> email: [[email protected]]
> >
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=2460624
> 
> To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail:
> [[email protected]].
> To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator,
> email: [[email protected]]

-- 
GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01

------------------------------------------------------
http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=2460633

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: 
[[email protected]].
To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator, email: 
[[email protected]]

Reply via email to