hi Rylan, We don't distribute this data with Arrow releases, but it is depended on by some unit tests. For the avoidance of ambiguity we should add the Apache 2.0 license to that repository.
- Wes On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 2:00 PM Rylan Dmello <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > I noticed that there's a parquet-testing repository linked as a Git submodule > from the Apache Arrow repository here: > > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/tree/master/cpp/submodules > > > The parquet-testing repository currently doesn't seem to have a license file. > I was wondering about what the licensing implications of this are. > > > Is the license considered to be implicitly 'inherited' from the parent Apache > Arrow repository? Perhaps it would be helpful to have an explicit license > file to eliminate any potential ambiguity here > > > Thanks, > > Rylan
