Why "converted"? Is there a conversion?
Le 29/05/2019 à 08:46, Deepak Majeti a écrit : > Hi Everyone, > > In the early days of parquet-cpp development, the developers mapped the > thrift::ConvertedType to parquet::LogicalType. > This now leads to confusion with the recent introduction of > thrift::LogicalType. > > Parquet Rust also adopted this incorrect naming convention. > > Are there any objections to renaming the Parquet::LogicalType to > Parquet::ConvertedType in both C++ and Rust? >
