Hi, We can ignore these missing artifacts.
-doc packages problem has been fixed by https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/4759 at master. We need to look into -dbgsym packages problem but -debsym packages aren't important for normal use. They are needed only for debugging libraries by debugger. So we can ignore this in 0.14.1. Thanks, -- kou In <cahm19a7zqrd+9csedke-evnpp6i6n8mn+u2zevobgtcxyx1...@mail.gmail.com> "Re: [DISCUSS] Need for 0.14.1 release due to Python package problems, Parquet forward compatibility problems" on Wed, 17 Jul 2019 02:34:45 +0200, Krisztián Szűcs <szucs.kriszt...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all! > > The release process was sort of fluid so far, except that the Java version > strings were > missing the -SNAPSHOT postfix in the pom files, which required some manual > intervention. > > I'm waiting for the binary builds to pass before sending out the vote > email, but sadly a > couple of debian binary artifacts are missing. I'm not sure how crucial is > the absence of > these binaries (mostly doc packages). @Kou? > > See the missing ones here: > https://gist.github.com/kszucs/1381878d3bff39477ee896c6f85665f5 > > On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 7:59 PM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 12:57 PM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > OK, that's been merged and updated. Here's a Crossbow build >> > >> >> >> https://github.com/ursa-labs/crossbow/branches/all?utf8=%E2%9C%93&query=build-665 >> >> I'll keep an eye on CI. Anything else I can do to help get an RC out >> please let me know >>
