On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 2:46 AM Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > We can ignore these missing artifacts. > > -doc packages problem has been fixed by > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/4759 at master. > I have a local workaround for it, so we are going to have the doc packages. Thanks! > > We need to look into -dbgsym packages problem but -debsym > packages aren't important for normal use. They are needed > only for debugging libraries by debugger. So we can ignore > this in 0.14.1. > > > Thanks, > -- > kou > > In <cahm19a7zqrd+9csedke-evnpp6i6n8mn+u2zevobgtcxyx1...@mail.gmail.com> > "Re: [DISCUSS] Need for 0.14.1 release due to Python package problems, > Parquet forward compatibility problems" on Wed, 17 Jul 2019 02:34:45 +0200, > Krisztián Szűcs <szucs.kriszt...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi all! > > > > The release process was sort of fluid so far, except that the Java > version > > strings were > > missing the -SNAPSHOT postfix in the pom files, which required some > manual > > intervention. > > > > I'm waiting for the binary builds to pass before sending out the vote > > email, but sadly a > > couple of debian binary artifacts are missing. I'm not sure how crucial > is > > the absence of > > these binaries (mostly doc packages). @Kou? > > > > See the missing ones here: > > https://gist.github.com/kszucs/1381878d3bff39477ee896c6f85665f5 > > > > On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 7:59 PM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 12:57 PM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > > >> > OK, that's been merged and updated. Here's a Crossbow build > >> > > >> > >> > >> > https://github.com/ursa-labs/crossbow/branches/all?utf8=%E2%9C%93&query=build-665 > >> > >> I'll keep an eye on CI. Anything else I can do to help get an RC out > >> please let me know > >> >
