Thanks Antoine, > Personally I run C++ / Java integration tests locally, without any Docker > image. But I wouldn't be able to run the other integration tests...
Right this where I started but I figured it's better to use docker as I'm not too familiar with other tool chains and the number of languages supported is expanding all the time. I'm thinking Krisztian is planning to solve this with "ursabot", I just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing anything. I'll plug away with the "arrow_integration_xenial_base" image for now. Paddy ________________________________ From: Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> Sent: Thursday, August 8, 2019 10:50 AM To: dev@arrow.apache.org <dev@arrow.apache.org> Subject: Re: Options for running the integration tests On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 20:29:13 +0000 paddy horan <paddyho...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > I have been away from Arrow for a while due to relocation of family and RSI. > I'd like to start working toward getting Rust passing the integration tests. > In the last few months a lot of work has been done to "dockerize" many of the > build steps in the project, which I'm trying to figure out. > > I started out using the 'arrow_integration_xenial_base' image and submitted a > PR to allow it to be built from a windows host, but I noticed that there is a > page in the pyarrow docs related to integration testing > (https://arrow.apache.org/docs/developers/integration.html) that uses > docker-compose from the top level of the project. That documentation page may be confusing things. It's entitled "integration testing" but it doesn't seem to talk about integration tests in the Arrow sense, rather regular unit tests. > It seems that the 'arrow_integration_xenial_base' image is replaced > by this solution? I have no idea. Perhaps Krisztian knows the answer? Personally I run C++ / Java integration tests locally, without any Docker image. But I wouldn't be able to run the other integration tests... Regards Antoine.
