FYI, using the kibble.dev link from INFRA-18533, it seems that this September we're using about 15% of the ASF's total Travis CI capacity (60 concurrent workers I think)
https://imgur.com/a/oOrbPsj The highest is Apache Druid (incubating) at 18%, so we are #2. Suffice to say the ASF's Travis couldn't accommodate us if we had twice as many pull requests On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 7:26 AM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I've been sounding the alarm bells about this for a while. We need to > work to get ourselves off of Travis CI, but it is not going to be > easy. > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 11:42 PM Micah Kornfield <emkornfi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > My understanding is the Travis CI queue is shared among all apache > > projects, and there are few including Arrow that make heavy use of the > > resources. Hence, a lot of time waiting for jobs to start. I think there > > are some open JIRAs to finish dockerization of builds, I don't know the > > current status of finding alternative CI sources though. > > > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 10:24 PM Andy Grove <andygrov...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I know this has been discussed in the past, and I apologize for not paying > > > attention at the time (and searching for arrow + travis in email isn't > > > very > > > effective) but why does it take so long for our Travis CI builds and are > > > there open JIRA issues related to this? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Andy. > > >
