On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 5:07 PM Andy Grove <andygrov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Krisztian. That's very helpful. I will create a CI page on the wiki > and add this info. > > Does anyone have any objections to me trying out GitHub Actions for running > the Rust tests on PR builds? I could try this out on my own fork first. > I think GitHub Actions is a good idea, especially for easier build setups like Rust has. Go, Node as similarly straightforward, so we could decommission the travis counterparts hopefully speeding up the rest of the builds a bit. > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 7:40 AM Krisztián Szűcs <szucs.kriszt...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 3:25 PM Andy Grove <andygrov...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > I've been poking around on the Arrow website and wiki and I can't find > > > documentation relating to CI. Do we have any documentation on how > things > > > work today or what the goals are? > > > > I don't think so. > > > > > For Rust builds it isn't immediately > > > obvious why they are building on both Travis CI and Ursabot. > > > > > We have another thread [1], where we discuss multiple things about > > Buildbot (ursabot). I've enabled the buildbot builder for rust because it > > provides much quicker feedback than travis does. > > > > [1]: > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/02f7981176b67a12618b96b7d3b13e38b8f862e14c735dcf0ae359e0@%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 6:33 AM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > FYI, using the kibble.dev link from INFRA-18533, it seems that this > > > > September we're using about 15% of the ASF's total Travis CI capacity > > > > (60 concurrent workers I think) > > > > > > > > https://imgur.com/a/oOrbPsj > > > > > > > > The highest is Apache Druid (incubating) at 18%, so we are #2. > Suffice > > > > to say the ASF's Travis couldn't accommodate us if we had twice as > > > > many pull requests > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 7:26 AM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I've been sounding the alarm bells about this for a while. We need > to > > > > > work to get ourselves off of Travis CI, but it is not going to be > > > > > easy.t > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 11:42 PM Micah Kornfield < > > > emkornfi...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > My understanding is the Travis CI queue is shared among all > apache > > > > > > projects, and there are few including Arrow that make heavy use > of > > > the > > > > > > resources. Hence, a lot of time waiting for jobs to start. I > > think > > > > there > > > > > > are some open JIRAs to finish dockerization of builds, I don't > know > > > the > > > > > > current status of finding alternative CI sources though. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 10:24 PM Andy Grove < > andygrov...@gmail.com > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I know this has been discussed in the past, and I apologize for > > not > > > > paying > > > > > > > attention at the time (and searching for arrow + travis in > email > > > > isn't very > > > > > > > effective) but why does it take so long for our Travis CI > builds > > > and > > > > are > > > > > > > there open JIRA issues related to this? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Andy. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
