I'll handle R packaging and Homebrew as usual, and I'll deploy the new
website too.

Neal


On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 6:08 AM Krisztián Szűcs <szucs.kriszt...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 2:25 PM Ryan Murray <rym...@dremio.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hey Krisztian,
> >
> > I agree. I ran it on LLVM/Clang 9 and 10 and it failed both times. Given
> > that everyone else had it succeed and there are a few tickets open around
> > LLVM > 8 I suspect it is Clang. I am currently running w/ 8 to see if it
> > passes. Do we have documents anywhere that list Gandiva's LLVM/Clang
> > requirements?
> I don't think so, but at least 10 should work since we extensively
> test it in our CI setup.
>
> Please try to reproduce it on the master branch and file a jira ticket
> if the issue persist.
> >
> > Best
> >
> > Ryan
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 1:18 PM Krisztián Szűcs <
> szucs.kriszt...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 3:57 PM Ryan Murray <rym...@dremio.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +0 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I verified source, release, binaries, integration tests for Python,
> C++,
> > > > Java. All went fine except for a failed test in c++ Gandiva: [
> FAILED  ]
> > > > TestProjector.TestDateTime
> > >
> > > It's hard to evaluate without any context.
> > >
> > > I executed specifically this test case locally and it has passed.
> > > According to the rest of the votes I don't consider it as a blocker.
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Not sure if this is known or expected?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 1:32 PM Andy Grove <andygrov...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (binding) on testing the Rust implementation only.
> > > > >
> > > > > I did notice that the release script is not updating all the
> versions
> > > > > correctly and I filed a JIRA [1].
> > > > >
> > > > > This shouldn't prevent the release though since this one version
> > > number can
> > > > > be updated manually when we publish the crates.
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-9537
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 8:08 PM Krisztián Szűcs <
> > > szucs.kriszt...@gmail.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC2) of
> > > Apache
> > > > > > Arrow version 1.0.0. This is a release consisting of 838
> > > > > > resolved JIRA issues[1].
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This release candidate is based on commit:
> > > > > > b0d623957db820de4f1ff0a5ebd3e888194a48f0 [2]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The source release rc2 is hosted at [3].
> > > > > > The binary artifacts are hosted at [4][5][6][7].
> > > > > > The changelog is located at [8].
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please download, verify checksums and signatures, run the unit
> tests,
> > > > > > and vote on the release. See [9] for how to validate a release
> > > candidate.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Arrow 1.0.0
> > > > > > [ ] +0
> > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Arrow 1.0.0 because...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1]:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20ARROW%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Closed%29%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.0.0
> > > > > > [2]:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/tree/b0d623957db820de4f1ff0a5ebd3e888194a48f0
> > > > > > [3]:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/apache-arrow-1.0.0-rc2
> > > > > > [4]: https://bintray.com/apache/arrow/centos-rc/1.0.0-rc2
> > > > > > [5]: https://bintray.com/apache/arrow/debian-rc/1.0.0-rc2
> > > > > > [6]: https://bintray.com/apache/arrow/python-rc/1.0.0-rc2
> > > > > > [7]: https://bintray.com/apache/arrow/ubuntu-rc/1.0.0-rc2
> > > > > > [8]:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/b0d623957db820de4f1ff0a5ebd3e888194a48f0/CHANGELOG.md
> > > > > > [9]:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ARROW/How+to+Verify+Release+Candidates
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
>

Reply via email to