> > I found that the project has these files for tensor checking > > https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/tree/e8ce32338f2dfeca3a5126f7677bdee159604000/data/arrow-ipc-tensor-stream
These are fuzzing files from the readme in that directory: > These files contain Arrow IPC tensor streams, usually invalid, that used > to produce crashes or undesirable behaviour when ingested by the Arrow C++ > IPC reader. Those files may contain data generated by fuzzers and may > therefore be hard to interpret by humans, but are useful as a fuzzing test > corpus and to avoid regressions. I don't think Tensor files have have considered to be "stable" with respect to the specification. I would have to check but I'm not sure they are even hooked into our cross-language integration testing framework (archery). -Micah On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 12:48 PM Fernando Herrera < fernando.j.herr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Neal, > > Thanks for the update and the link. > > I found that the project has these files for tensor checking > > https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/tree/e8ce32338f2dfeca3a5126f7677bdee159604000/data/arrow-ipc-tensor-stream > > So, if I understand correctly, for any application to be compatible > with C++ tensors it should be able to read these files. Am I correct? > > Thanks, > Fernando > > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 7:24 PM Neal Richardson < > neal.p.richard...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi Fernando, > > https://arrow.apache.org/docs/status.html lists the implementation > status > > across languages, and that mostly reflects integration testing I think > > (though there may be some features listed as "implemented" that aren't > > tested). > > > > Neal > > > > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 5:00 AM Fernando Herrera < > > fernando.j.herr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Does anyone know what is the status for the dense and sparse tensor > > tests? > > > I was looking for a data file with a tensor created with the C++ > > > implementation > > > but I couldnt find anything. Is anybody testing IPC for a tensor? > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > > > Fernando > > > > > >
