yes, i strongly agree with this idea
i was preparing a static site last week taht I plan to show on wednesday

On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 11:13 AM Krisztián Szűcs <szucs.kriszt...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> We could generate a static website on the crossbow github page
> including more details about the failures - this would keep crossbow
> self-contained.
> I'd suggest still sending the failing builds on the new mailing list
> (including the static page's link), so we get notified by the
> failures.
>
> On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 4:01 PM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Frankly I think we should move these reports to a real website rather
> than
> > sending these emails. The emails to me were always a stopgap to add some
> > visibility where there previously was little (you had to go digging on
> > crossbow).
> >
> > On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 2:01 AM Krisztián Szűcs <
> szucs.kriszt...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 7:30 PM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I just requested builds@ to be created on the self-service platform.
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Having a separate list sounds like a good idea to me.
> > > Could we enable HTML emails on that list?
> > > See jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-12822
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 10:12 AM Mauricio Vargas
> > > > <mavarga...@uc.cl.invalid> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > hi
> > > > >
> > > > > I agree with this, and being the person who has been digging into
> > > nightly
> > > > > errors, I can move this to a weekly email to builds@
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 11:14 AM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > hi folks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In an effort to increase the signal-to-noise ratio on dev@, I
> > > suggest
> > > > > > that we move the [NIGHTLY] e-mails to a separate
> > > > > > bui...@arrow.apache.org e-mail address (or similarly named).
> Having
> > > > > > them on a mailing list makes it easy for us to see them when we
> want
> > > > > > to see them, but otherwise for many it's an e-mail filter to be
> set
> > > up
> > > > > > when you first subscribe to dev@.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thoughts? Would someone like to implement this change?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Wes
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > —
> > > > > *Mauricio 'Pachá' Vargas Sepúlveda*
> > > > > Site: pacha.dev
> > > > > Blog: pacha.dev/blog
> > >
>


-- 
—
*Mauricio 'Pachá' Vargas Sepúlveda*
Site: pacha.dev
Blog: pacha.dev/blog

Reply via email to