+1 On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 7:47 PM Julian Hyde <jhyde.apa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 > > > On Jun 25, 2021, at 10:36 AM, Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> wrote: > > > > > > Le 24/06/2021 à 21:16, Weston Pace a écrit : > >> The discussion in [1] led to the following proposal which I would like > >> to submit for a vote. > >> --- > >> Arrow allows a timestamp column to omit the time zone property. This > >> has caused confusion because some people have interpreted a timestamp > >> without a time zone to be an Instant while others have interpreted it > >> to be a LocalDateTime. > >> This proposal is to clarify the Arrow schema (via comments) and assert > >> that a timestamp without a time zone should be interpreted as > >> LocalDateTime. > >> Note: For definitions of Instant and LocalDateTime (and a discussion > >> on the semantics) please refer to [3] > >> --- > > > > +1 > >
