C On Thu, Jun 24, 2021, 18:08 David Li <lidav...@apache.org> wrote:
> I would also be in favor of option C, or also E if having that distinction > in the schema is important to some application. > > -David > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021, at 17:16, Andrew Lamb wrote: > > C > > > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 5:05 PM Rok Mihevc <rok.mih...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > C > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 9:55 PM Nate Bauernfeind < > > > natebauernfe...@deephaven.io> wrote: > > > > > > > Option C. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 1:53 PM Joris Peeters < > > > joris.mg.peet...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > C > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 8:39 PM Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Option C. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le 24/06/2021 à 21:24, Weston Pace a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This proposal states that Arrow should define how to encode an > > > > Instant > > > > > > > into Arrow data. There are several ways this could happen, > some > > > > which > > > > > > > change schema.fbs and some which do not. > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For sample arguments (currently grouped as "for changing > > > schema.fbs" > > > > > > > and "against changing schema.fbs") see [2]. For a detailed > > > > definition > > > > > > > of the terms LocalDateTime, ZonedDateTime, and Instant and a > > > > > > > discussion of their semantics see [3]. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Options: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A) Do nothing, don’t introduce the nuance of “instants” into > Arrow > > > > > > > B) Do nothing, but update the comments in schema.fbs to > acknowledge > > > > > > > the existence of the concept and explain that implementations > are > > > > free > > > > > > > to decide if/how to support the type. > > > > > > > C) Define timestamp with timezone “UTC” as “instant”. > > > > > > > D) Add a first class instant type to schema.fbs > > > > > > > E) Add instant as a canonical extension type > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Note: This is just a straw poll and the results will not be > binding > > > > in > > > > > > > any way but will help craft a future vote. For example, if the > > > > > > > plurality of votes goes to C but a majority of votes is spread > > > across > > > > > > > A & B then some flavor of A/B would likely be pursued. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vote for as many options as you would like. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I will summarize and send out the results in 72 hours. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > >
