+1

I triggered additional checks on the RC branch (
https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/11671#issuecomment-969186937) and the
various sanitizers and other checks that simulate CRAN all passed.

Neal

On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 9:37 PM Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Unfortunately, it's too late for 6.0.1 RC1. If it's not a
> critical bug in 6.0.0, I think that it's not a blocker of
> 6.0.1 RC1. There are people who wait for fixes in 6.0.1
> RC1. If it's needed, we can release 6.0.2 instead of
> preparing 6.0.1 RC2 for it.
>
>
> Thanks,
> --
> kou
>
> In <cak7z5t9l+g2_uozc9xbu01kr4ofapnbwsph+fct+kg+jqfu...@mail.gmail.com>
>   "Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 6.0.1 - RC1" on Fri, 12 Nov 2021
> 19:52:45 -0800,
>   Micah Kornfield <emkornfi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure if it is too late but it would be nice to get
> > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/11693/files in if possible.  I will
> > try to run verification tomorrow.
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 3:22 PM Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote:
> >
> >> PMC members, could you verify and vote this?
> >>
> >> In <20211111.113935.367831584872861272....@clear-code.com>
> >>   "[VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 6.0.1 - RC1" on Thu, 11 Nov 2021 11:39:35
> >> +0900 (JST),
> >>   Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC1) of
> Apache
> >> > Arrow version 6.0.1. This is a release consisting of 29
> >> > resolved JIRA issues[1].
> >> >
> >> > This release candidate is based on commit:
> >> > 347a88ff9d20e2a4061eec0b455b8ea1aa8335dc [2]
> >> >
> >> > The source release rc1 is hosted at [3].
> >> > The binary artifacts are hosted at [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11].
> >> > The changelog is located at [12].
> >> >
> >> > Please download, verify checksums and signatures, run the unit tests,
> >> > and vote on the release. See [13] for how to validate a release
> >> candidate.
> >> >
> >> > See also verification results by GitHub Actions:
> >> >
> >> >   https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/11671
> >> >
> >> > There are some known failures:
> >> >
> >> >   * verify-rc-source-integration-linux-amd64
> >> >   * verify-rc-source-python-macos-arm64
> >> >   * verify-rc-wheels-macos-11-amd64
> >> >   * verify-rc-wheels-macos-11-arm64
> >> >
> >> > They except verify-rc-source-integration-linux-amd64 are
> >> > also failed with 6.0.0 RC3:
> >> >
> >> >   https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/11511
> >> >
> >> > Here is the verify-rc-source-integration-linux-amd64 log:
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> https://github.com/ursacomputing/crossbow/runs/4172486523?check_suite_focus=true
> >> >
> >> > I'm not sure whether this is a blocker or not.
> >> >
> >> > Note that the verification passed on my local machine.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >> >
> >> > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Arrow 6.0.1
> >> > [ ] +0
> >> > [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Arrow 6.0.1 because...
> >> >
> >> > [1]:
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20ARROW%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Closed%29%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%206.0.1
> >> > [2]:
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/tree/347a88ff9d20e2a4061eec0b455b8ea1aa8335dc
> >> > [3]:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/apache-arrow-6.0.1-rc1
> >> > [4]: https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/almalinux-rc/
> >> > [5]: https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/amazon-linux-rc/
> >> > [6]: https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/centos-rc/
> >> > [7]: https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/debian-rc/
> >> > [8]: https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/java-rc/6.0.1-rc1
> >> > [9]: https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/nuget-rc/6.0.1-rc1
> >> > [10]: https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/python-rc/6.0.1-rc1
> >> > [11]: https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/ubuntu-rc/
> >> > [12]:
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/347a88ff9d20e2a4061eec0b455b8ea1aa8335dc/CHANGELOG.md
> >> > [13]:
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ARROW/How+to+Verify+Release+Candidates
> >>
>

Reply via email to