+1
Really well written, thanks for driving this!
On Mon, 29 Aug 2022, 11:16 Antoine Pitrou, <anto...@python.org> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Just a heads up that more PMC votes are needed here.
>
>
>
> Le 24/08/2022 à 17:24, Antoine Pitrou a écrit :
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like to propose we vote for the following set of rules for
> > registering well-known ("canonical") extension types.
> >
> >
> > * Canonical extension types are described and maintained in a separate
> > document under the format specifications directory:
> > https://github.com/apache/arrow/tree/master/docs/source/format (note
> > this gets turned into HTML docs by Sphinx =>
> > https://arrow.apache.org/docs/index.html)
> >
> > * Each canonical extension type requires a separate discussion and vote
> > on the mailing-list
> >
> > * The specification text to be added *must* follow these requirements
> >
> > 1) It *must* have a well-defined name starting with
> "org.apache.arrow."
> > 2) Its parameters, if any, *must* be described in the proposal
> > 3) Its serialization *must* be described in the proposal and should
> > not require unduly work or unusual software dependencies (for example, a
> > trivial custom text format or JSON would be acceptable)
> > 4) Its expected semantics *should* be described as well and any
> > potential ambiguities or pain points addressed or at least mentioned
> >
> > * The extension type *should* have one implementation submitted;
> > preferably two if non-trivial (for example if parameterized)
> >
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Accept this proposal
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1 Do not accept this proposal because...
> >
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Antoine.
>
