+1 with "arrow." prefix because we already use "ARROW:" not
"ORG.APACHE.ARROW:" for reserved metadata name prefix.

https://arrow.apache.org/docs/format/Columnar.html#custom-application-metadata

> The ARROW pattern is a reserved namespace for internal
> Arrow use in the custom_metadata fields. For example,
> ARROW:extension:name.

Thanks,
-- 
kou

In <332e3d0a-5765-198d-d4ce-c0ad20443...@python.org>
  "[VOTE] Format: Rules and procedures for Canonical extension types" on Wed, 
24 Aug 2022 17:24:19 +0200,
  Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> wrote:

> 
> Hello,
> 
> I would like to propose we vote for the following set of rules for
> registering well-known ("canonical") extension types.
> 
> 
> * Canonical extension types are described and maintained in a separate
> * document under the format specifications directory:
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/tree/master/docs/source/format (note
> this gets turned into HTML docs by Sphinx =>
> https://arrow.apache.org/docs/index.html)
> 
> * Each canonical extension type requires a separate discussion and vote
> * on the mailing-list
> 
> * The specification text to be added *must* follow these requirements
> 
>   1) It *must* have a well-defined name starting with
>   "org.apache.arrow."
>   2) Its parameters, if any, *must* be described in the proposal
>   3) Its serialization *must* be described in the proposal and should
>   not require unduly work or unusual software dependencies (for example,
>   a trivial custom text format or JSON would be acceptable)
>   4) Its expected semantics *should* be described as well and any
>   potential ambiguities or pain points addressed or at least mentioned
> 
> * The extension type *should* have one implementation submitted;
> * preferably two if non-trivial (for example if parameterized)
> 
> 
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> 
> [ ] +1 Accept this proposal
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not accept this proposal because...
> 
> 
> Regards
> 
> Antoine.

Reply via email to