If there's no engagement, then I'm afraid it might mean that third
parties have no interest in this. I don't really have any solution for
generating engagement except nagging and pinging people explicitly :-)
Le 27/02/2024 à 19:09, Matt Topol a écrit :
I would like to see the same Antoine, currently given the lack of
engagement (both for OR against) I was going to take the silence as assent
and hope for non-Voltron Data PMC members to vote in this.
If anyone has any suggestions on how we could potentially generate more
engagement and discussion on this, please let me know as I want as many
parties in the community as possible to be part of this.
Thanks everyone.
--Matt
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 12:48 PM Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> wrote:
Hello,
I'd really like to see more engagement and criticism from non-Voltron
Data parties before this is formally adopted as an Arrow spec.
Regards
Antoine.
Le 27/02/2024 à 18:35, Matt Topol a écrit :
Hey all,
I'd like to propose a vote for us to officially adopt the protocol
described in the google doc[1] for Dissociated Arrow IPC Transports. This
proposal was originally discussed at [2]. Once this proposal is adopted,
I
will work on adding the necessary documentation to the Arrow website
along
with examples etc.
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
[ ] +1 Accept this Proposal
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 Do not accept this proposal because...
Thank you everyone!
--Matt
[1]:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zHbnyK1r6KHpMOtEdIg1EZKNzHx-MVgUMOzB87GuXyk/edit#heading=h.38515dnp2bdb
[2]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/tn5wt4p52f6kqjtx3tjxqd9122n4pf94
