I'll continue my efforts of trying to reach out to other interested parties, but if anyone else here has any contacts or connections that they think might be interested please forward them the link to the Google doc.
I really do want to get as much engagement and feedback as possible on this. Thanks! On Tue, Feb 27, 2024, 6:38 PM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: > Have there been efforts to proactively reach out to other third parties > that might have an interest in this or be a potential user at some point? > There are a lot of interested parties in Arrow that may not actively follow > the mailing list. > > Seems like folks from the Dask, Ray, RAPIDS (especially folks at NVIDIA or > working on UCX), or other communities like that might have constructive > thoughts about this. DLPack (https://dmlc.github.io/dlpack/latest/) also > seems adjacent and worth reaching out to. Other ideas for projects or > companies that could be reached out to for feedback. > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 5:23 PM Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> wrote: > > > > > If there's no engagement, then I'm afraid it might mean that third > > parties have no interest in this. I don't really have any solution for > > generating engagement except nagging and pinging people explicitly :-) > > > > > > > > Le 27/02/2024 à 19:09, Matt Topol a écrit : > > > I would like to see the same Antoine, currently given the lack of > > > engagement (both for OR against) I was going to take the silence as > > assent > > > and hope for non-Voltron Data PMC members to vote in this. > > > > > > If anyone has any suggestions on how we could potentially generate more > > > engagement and discussion on this, please let me know as I want as many > > > parties in the community as possible to be part of this. > > > > > > Thanks everyone. > > > > > > --Matt > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 12:48 PM Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> Hello, > > >> > > >> I'd really like to see more engagement and criticism from non-Voltron > > >> Data parties before this is formally adopted as an Arrow spec. > > >> > > >> Regards > > >> > > >> Antoine. > > >> > > >> > > >> Le 27/02/2024 à 18:35, Matt Topol a écrit : > > >>> Hey all, > > >>> > > >>> I'd like to propose a vote for us to officially adopt the protocol > > >>> described in the google doc[1] for Dissociated Arrow IPC Transports. > > This > > >>> proposal was originally discussed at [2]. Once this proposal is > > adopted, > > >> I > > >>> will work on adding the necessary documentation to the Arrow website > > >> along > > >>> with examples etc. > > >>> > > >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > >>> > > >>> [ ] +1 Accept this Proposal > > >>> [ ] +0 > > >>> [ ] -1 Do not accept this proposal because... > > >>> > > >>> Thank you everyone! > > >>> > > >>> --Matt > > >>> > > >>> [1]: > > >>> > > >> > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zHbnyK1r6KHpMOtEdIg1EZKNzHx-MVgUMOzB87GuXyk/edit#heading=h.38515dnp2bdb > > >>> [2]: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/tn5wt4p52f6kqjtx3tjxqd9122n4pf94 > > >>> > > >> > > > > > >