+1 (binding) On Wed, Sep 2, 2026 at 5:24 AM Raúl Cumplido <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 (binding) > > El mar, 1 sept 2026, 23:02, Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]> escribió: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > In <[email protected]> > > "[VOTE] Informal deprecation of Tensor and SparseTensor in IPC" on Tue, > > 1 Sep 2026 16:30:36 +0200, > > Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > This is a vote about the informal deprecation of Tensor and > > > SparseTensor messages in the IPC protocol. This was previously > > > discussed in > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/z2kl4g1353mbtgpt3qo7j3bzohq0q7fv > > > > > > Here is the proposal: > > > > > > 1) informally deprecate Tensor and SparseTensor-related IPC messages > > > in the IPC protocol description and the IPC Flatbuffers definitions > > > > > > (the Flatbuffers deprecation mechanism is *not* used for now because > > > it would break existing usage: > > > https://flatbuffers.dev/evolution/#removal) > > > > > > 2) encourage Arrow implementations to deprecate (and possibly remove) > > > APIs for reading and writing Tensor / SparseTensor metadata and data > > > using the IPC protocol. > > > > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > > > [ ] +1 to the proposal > > > [ ] +0 > > > [ ] -1 to the proposal because ... > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Antoine. > > > > > > > > >
