+1 (binding)
On Wed, Sep 2, 2026 at 11:53 Dewey Dunnington <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2026 at 8:58 PM Gang Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2026 at 5:24 AM Raúl Cumplido <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > El mar, 1 sept 2026, 23:02, Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]> > escribió: > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > In <[email protected]> > > > > "[VOTE] Informal deprecation of Tensor and SparseTensor in IPC" on > > Tue, > > > > 1 Sep 2026 16:30:36 +0200, > > > > Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > This is a vote about the informal deprecation of Tensor and > > > > > SparseTensor messages in the IPC protocol. This was previously > > > > > discussed in > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/z2kl4g1353mbtgpt3qo7j3bzohq0q7fv > > > > > > > > > > Here is the proposal: > > > > > > > > > > 1) informally deprecate Tensor and SparseTensor-related IPC > messages > > > > > in the IPC protocol description and the IPC Flatbuffers definitions > > > > > > > > > > (the Flatbuffers deprecation mechanism is *not* used for now > because > > > > > it would break existing usage: > > > > > https://flatbuffers.dev/evolution/#removal) > > > > > > > > > > 2) encourage Arrow implementations to deprecate (and possibly > remove) > > > > > APIs for reading and writing Tensor / SparseTensor metadata and > data > > > > > using the IPC protocol. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 to the proposal > > > > > [ ] +0 > > > > > [ ] -1 to the proposal because ... > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > > > Antoine. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
