Hi All,
As I was diving into metadata format I have encountered that presumably some
time ago we wanted to support Enum derived types, but the implementation is
missing.
However derived record type allocates a separate field “Enum values”, which
seems to be null in all the cases:
{ "DataverseName": "Metadata", "DatatypeName":
"Field_NodeNames_in_NodeGroupRecordType", "Derived": { "Tag": "UNORDEREDLIST",
"IsAnonymous": true, "EnumValues": null, "Record": null, "Union": null,
"UnorderedList": "string", "OrderedList": null }, "Timestamp": "Wed Jun 24
12:08:21 PDT 2015" }
So here is the question: am I getting right that we don’t support AQL
enumerations yet? If not should we keep this extra field in metadata? (which
essentially adds up unused space for each type’ metadata description). I
believe we can safely move it out into open part of the record.
Best regards,
Ildar
