Agreed.... On 6/24/15 12:25 PM, Ildar Absalyamov wrote:
Hi All,As I was diving into metadata format I have encountered that presumably some time ago we wanted to support Enum derived types, but the implementation is missing. However derived record type allocates a separate field “Enum values”, which seems to be null in all the cases: { "DataverseName": "Metadata", "DatatypeName": "Field_NodeNames_in_NodeGroupRecordType", "Derived": { "Tag": "UNORDEREDLIST", "IsAnonymous": true, "EnumValues": null, "Record": null, "Union": null, "UnorderedList": "string", "OrderedList": null }, "Timestamp": "Wed Jun 24 12:08:21 PDT 2015" } So here is the question: am I getting right that we don’t support AQL enumerations yet? If not should we keep this extra field in metadata? (which essentially adds up unused space for each type’ metadata description). I believe we can safely move it out into open part of the record. Best regards, Ildar
