Sounds good to me. On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Erb, Stephan <stephan....@blue-yonder.com> wrote:
> +1 for catching up > ________________________________________ > From: John Sirois <j...@conductant.com> > Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2016 4:18 PM > To: dev@aurora.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Amend 0.12.0 release goals > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Bill Farner <wfar...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Given that we are still playing catch-up to mesos releases (we are on > > 0.25.0, latest is 0.26.0, there's talk of cutting 0.27.0 soon), i would > > like to suggest that we remove these tickets from 0.12.0: > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-987 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1150 > > > > It's slightly unfortunate as these tickets represent the largest planned > > effort for 0.12.0, we had a handful of significant contributions that > still > > make this a featureful release: > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/aurora/blob/d542bd1d58bc5dcf6ead95d902c0a8cecbbffe9e/NEWS#L3-L23 > > > > Additionally, i would like to recommend that we add the following ticket > to > > 0.12.0 since we have an in-fight patch that looks close to completion: > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1109 > > > +1 to the proposal, catching up would be good to do. > > I clarified the status of AURORA-987 by stopping progress and > un-assigning. Although I'm working towards that ticket, its by very > indirect means still and I'll re-assign and re-start once I'm actually > engaged in the meat of the API proposal that is needed assuming no one else > has dived in. > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Bill > > > > > > -- > John Sirois > 303-512-3301 >
