+1
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Joshua Cohen <jco...@apache.org> wrote: > Sounds good to me. > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Erb, Stephan <stephan....@blue-yonder.com> > wrote: > >> +1 for catching up >> ________________________________________ >> From: John Sirois <j...@conductant.com> >> Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2016 4:18 PM >> To: dev@aurora.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Amend 0.12.0 release goals >> >> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Bill Farner <wfar...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> > Given that we are still playing catch-up to mesos releases (we are on >> > 0.25.0, latest is 0.26.0, there's talk of cutting 0.27.0 soon), i would >> > like to suggest that we remove these tickets from 0.12.0: >> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-987 >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1150 >> > >> > It's slightly unfortunate as these tickets represent the largest planned >> > effort for 0.12.0, we had a handful of significant contributions that >> still >> > make this a featureful release: >> > >> > >> > >> https://github.com/apache/aurora/blob/d542bd1d58bc5dcf6ead95d902c0a8cecbbffe9e/NEWS#L3-L23 >> > >> > Additionally, i would like to recommend that we add the following ticket >> to >> > 0.12.0 since we have an in-fight patch that looks close to completion: >> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1109 >> >> >> +1 to the proposal, catching up would be good to do. >> >> I clarified the status of AURORA-987 by stopping progress and >> un-assigning. Although I'm working towards that ticket, its by very >> indirect means still and I'll re-assign and re-start once I'm actually >> engaged in the meat of the API proposal that is needed assuming no one else >> has dived in. >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > Cheers, >> > >> > Bill >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> John Sirois >> 303-512-3301 >>
