On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Jake Farrell <jfarr...@apache.org> wrote:
> Released source artifacts have all ready been promoted, any committer can > update the website to reflect this change (though ideally it is handled > immediately after the release is promoted). > > For the binary artifacts since they where not included in the initial vote > with the source artifacts they will need to be a separate vote > And I have been tardy getting an RC out for the debs (doc site update blocks on binaries since it has links). I'll be getting the vote started for this later today. > -Jake > > > > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Erb, Stephan <Stephan.Erb > @blue-yonder.com> wrote: > >> Even though we have done the voting, the release is still pending. We >> still have to build the packages and update the website. >> >> Is there a way we can help out here? >> >> Best, >> Stephan >> ________________________________________ >> From: John Sirois <jsir...@apache.org> >> Sent: Monday, February 8, 2016 23:47 >> To: dev@aurora.apache.org >> Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.12.0 RC4 >> >> All, >> The vote to accept Apache Aurora 0.12.0 RC4 >> as the official Apache Aurora 0.12.0 release has passed. >> >> >> +1 (Binding) >> ------------------------------ >> jsirois >> wfarner >> serb >> maxim >> >> >> +1 (Non-binding) >> ------------------------------ >> >> >> There were no 0 or -1 votes. Thank you to all who helped make this >> release. >> >> >> Aurora 0.12.0 includes the following: >> --- >> The CHANGELOG for the release is available at: >> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora.git&f=CHANGELOG&hb=rel/0.12.0 >> >> The tag used to create the release with is rel/0.12.0: >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora.git&hb=rel/0.12.0 >> >> The release is available at: >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/aurora/0.12.0/apache-aurora-0.12.0.tar.gz >> >> The MD5 checksum of the release can be found at: >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/aurora/0.12.0/apache-aurora-0.12.0.tar.gz.md5 >> >> The signature of the release can be found at: >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/aurora/0.12.0/apache-aurora-0.12.0.asc >> >> The GPG key used to sign the release are available at: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/aurora/KEYS >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 3:14 PM, John Sirois <jsir...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> > All, >> > >> > I propose that we accept the following release candidate as the official >> > Apache Aurora 0.12.0 release. >> > >> > Aurora 0.12.0-rc4 includes the following: >> > --- >> > The NEWS for the release is available at: >> > >> > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora.git&f=NEWS&hb=rel/0.12.0-rc4 >> > >> > The CHANGELOG for the release is available at: >> > >> > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora.git&f=CHANGELOG&hb=rel/0.12.0-rc4 >> > >> > The tag used to create the release candidate is: >> > >> > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/rel/0.12.0-rc4 >> > >> > The release candidate is available at: >> > >> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/aurora/0.12.0-rc4/apache-aurora-0.12.0-rc4.tar.gz >> > >> > The MD5 checksum of the release candidate can be found at: >> > >> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/aurora/0.12.0-rc4/apache-aurora-0.12.0-rc4.tar.gz.md5 >> > >> > The signature of the release candidate can be found at: >> > >> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/aurora/0.12.0-rc4/apache-aurora-0.12.0-rc4.tar.gz.asc >> > >> > The GPG key used to sign the release are available at: >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/aurora/KEYS >> > >> > Please download, verify, and test. >> > >> > The vote will close on Mon Feb 8 15:12:45 MST 2016 >> > >> > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Aurora 0.12.0 >> > [ ] +0 >> > [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Aurora 0.12.0 because... >> > --- >> > >> > Reminder: you can verify the release candidate via: >> > >> > ./build-support/release/verify-release-candidate 0.12.0-rc4 >> > >> > If you can deploy the RC to a test cluster and evaluate it there, even >> > better. >> > >> > >
