stop it already! This is not very efficient co-operation, is it? Break out of the disagreement loop and work on agreement, rather than driving things into conflict.
Peter, why don't you revert the change, bring it up for proposal, make your case once more, we can re-vote, and then can we /please/ just accept the outcome and move on.
Steve, take a break. We're not politicians. The moment we stop working together on a first-name basis I'm outta here!
sheesh.
grz,
- Leo
Stephen McConnell wrote:
Peter:
There was discussion on the subject of log listener related methods
prior to the release of logkit during which it was my understanding
that the add/remove listener was the preferred approach over a set
approach.
Not preferred by me. Mind numbingly stupid I thought but that is to be expected when the people who are "designing" the functionality don't even know what the use case is.
Mr. Donald,
Given that the consensus established with this forum was to processed with a add/remove even though this was not your preferred scenario (ignoring the implication of the mind numbing stupidity that apparent exists across this community), would you please consider this as my -1 on your change. Should you which to bring this up for discussion I will be more than willing to review this subject further and look forward to your justification for the non-existence of the "add/remove" use case.
Unfortunately, according to the policies and procedures we have established within Avalon, "mind numbingly stupid" opinions still count.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
