On Sun, 2 Mar 2003 11:22, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Alternatively, perhaps Peter would post up his "dodgy syslog-like server."
will try to in next bit. > OK, I've been looking at the source for SocketOutputTarget. There appears > to be an issue. The constructor attempts to bind the socket. A socket > listener may not be available, or always available. Seems to me that the > class should be (re-)binding as necessary when logging the data. > > Comments? In hindsigh maybe that would have been a good idea. But for backwards compatability reasons I would prefer a new RebindingSocketTarget or similar. -- Cheers, Peter Donald *----------------------------------------------------* | We must become the change we want to see. - Gandhi | *----------------------------------------------------* --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
