On Tue, 4 Mar 2003 20:09, Stephen McConnell wrote: > Have ust taken a look at the candidate and I noticed that your using > excalibur-pool-1.1. The excalibur-pool (CVS candidate version) is 1.2 > include the switch from excalibur-collections to commons-collections. I > think it would be a good idea to replace excalibur-pool-1.1 with 1.2 and > include the comons-collectons-2.1 jar file (commons colections 2.1 > replaces the excalibur-collection dependency). I would also be a good > idea to validate if the excalibur-collections jar file is referenced by > any of the other resouces and if not it can be removed. If it is > referenced by something then we should look at migrating to > commons-collections.
Don't need to upgrade it - we should not be breaking client code between micro releases which this would do. Phoenix does not use this code anyway so it has no effect on phoenix. -- Cheers, Peter Donald ----------------------------------------------- "You can't depend on your eyes when your imagination is out of focus." -Mark Twain ----------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
