> On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 11:27:28PM +0800, Niclas Hedhman wrote: >> For each person the "perfect choice" is different than other people's >> "perfect choice", because the requirements are different. But the >> requirements for a particular developer does not change very rapidly, >> therefor you are easily under the perception that a "single container >> will be perfect" illusion. >> I for instance, wants an ultra-lightweight J2ME container for embedded >> applications, but ALSO want a "Super Phoenix", possibly a variant of >> the Merlin works as well (have not studied Fortress so can't say). >> I therefor no longer believe in "one size fits all". > > Perhaps this is naive - but can't we develop something that's scalable > from J2ME to super size? Linux runs on small devices but also super > computers - can't we achieve the same? There are some really brilliant > developers here (excluding me of course! :) )
It is VERY difficult to get J2ME as a minimum requirement for a "atto-container" or whatever you to call the container-container. Especially since there is no File support in J2ME (at least not in CDLC as I am using). And Collections are very popular, but off-limit... and so on. Niclas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
