On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 11:24:53AM -0400, Berin Loritsch wrote:
> The NanoKernel approach (smaller than MicroKernel) would let us add in
> exactly
> what we needed. Features could be added in like components/modules. The
> default set would be your ultra-lightwieght container. Your super-phoenix
> would be made possible as well. In fact new features we haven't thought of
> yet could all be made part of the container without forcing us all to agree
> to one set of requirements.
This sounds great. :)
Cheers,
Marcus
--
.....
,,$$$$$$$$$, Marcus Crafter
;$' '$$$$: Computer Systems Engineer
$: $$$$: ManageSoft GmbH
$ o_)$$$: 82-84 Mainzer Landstrasse
;$, _/\ &&:' 60327 Frankfurt Germany
' /( &&&
\_&&&&'
&&&&.
&&&&&&&:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]