> -----Original Message----- > From: Henning P. Schmiedehausen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 02 November 2004 09:38 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Example "closed" site > > "Farr, Aaron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >I uploaded a simple example of an "Avalon is Closed" notice at: > > >http://avalon.apache.org/closed.html > > I still don't understand why the "common" components like Framework > or LogKit are not moved back to Avalon. > > These are core components from which all projects benefit, no matter > whether they are called Excalibur, Metro or anything else.
+1 > There seemed to be at least some agreement between the fractions that > keeping compatibility to these parts is an intention of everyone. So > why not put them back here? +1 Steve. > Regards > Henning > > -- > Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH > [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/ > > RedHat Certified Engineer -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire > Linux, Java, perl, Solaris -- Consulting, Training, Development > > What is more important to you... > [ ] Product Security > or [ ] Quality of Sales and Marketing Support > -- actual question from a Microsoft customer survey > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]