> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henning P. Schmiedehausen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 02 November 2004 09:38
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Example "closed" site
> 
> "Farr, Aaron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> >I uploaded a simple example of an "Avalon is Closed" notice at:
> 
> >http://avalon.apache.org/closed.html
> 
> I still don't understand why the "common" components like Framework
> or LogKit are not moved back to Avalon.
> 
> These are core components from which all projects benefit, no matter
> whether they are called Excalibur, Metro or anything else.

+1

> There seemed to be at least some agreement between the fractions that
> keeping compatibility to these parts is an intention of everyone. So
> why not put them back here?

+1

Steve.


>       Regards
>               Henning
> 
> --
> Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen          INTERMETA GmbH
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]        +49 9131 50 654 0   http://www.intermeta.de/
> 
> RedHat Certified Engineer -- Jakarta Turbine Development  -- hero for
hire
>    Linux, Java, perl, Solaris -- Consulting, Training, Development
> 
> What is more important to you...
>    [ ] Product Security
> or [ ] Quality of Sales and Marketing Support
>               -- actual question from a Microsoft customer survey
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to