陈竞, what are you specifically curious about regarding state? Are you
wanting to know what the SQL State API equivalent is for SQL? Or are you
asking an operational question about where the state for a given SQL
pipeline will live?

-Tyler


On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 12:39 PM Mingmin Xu <mingm...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks @JB, will come out the initial PR soon.
>
> On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
> wrote:
>
> > As discussed, I created the DSL_SQL branch with the skeleton. Mingmin is
> > rebasing on this branch to submit the PR.
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> >
> > On 04/09/2017 08:02 PM, Mingmin Xu wrote:
> >
> >> State is not touched yet, welcome to add it.
> >>
> >> On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 2:40 AM, 陈竞 <cj.mag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> how will this sql support state both in streaming and batch mode
> >>>
> >>> 2017-04-07 4:54 GMT+08:00 Mingmin Xu <mingm...@gmail.com>:
> >>>
> >>> @Tyler, there's no big change in the previous design doc, I added some
> >>>> details in chapter 'Part 2. DML( [INSERT] SELECT )' , describing steps
> >>>> to
> >>>> process a query, feel free to leave a comment.
> >>>>
> >>>> Come through your doc of 'EMIT', it's awesome from my perspective.
> I've
> >>>> some tests on GroupBy with default triggers/allowed_lateness now. EMIT
> >>>> syntax can be added to fill the gap.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Tyler Akidau <taki...@apache.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm very excited by this development as well, thanks for continuing to
> >>>>>
> >>>> push
> >>>>
> >>>>> this forward, Mingmin. :-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I noticed you'd made some changes to your design doc
> >>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Uc5xYTpO9qsLXtT38OfuoqSLimH_
> >>>>> 0a1Bz5BsCROMzCU/edit>.
> >>>>> Is it ready for another review? How reflective is it currently of the
> >>>>>
> >>>> work
> >>>>
> >>>>> that going into the feature branch?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> In parallel, I'd also like to continue helping push forward the
> >>>>>
> >>>> definition
> >>>>
> >>>>> of unified model semantics for SQL so we can get Calcite to a point
> >>>>>
> >>>> where
> >>>
> >>>> it supports the full Beam model. I added a comment
> >>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-301?
> >>>>>
> >>>> focusedCommentId=15959621&
> >>>>
> >>>>> page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:
> >>>>> comment-tabpanel#comment-15959621>
> >>>>> on the JIRA suggesting I create a doc with a specification proposal
> for
> >>>>> EMIT (and any other necessary semantic changes) that we can then
> >>>>>
> >>>> iterate
> >>>
> >>>> on
> >>>>
> >>>>> in public with the Calcite folks. I already have most of the content
> >>>>> written (and there's a significant amount of background needed to
> >>>>>
> >>>> justify
> >>>
> >>>> some aspects of the proposal), so it'll mostly be a matter of pulling
> >>>>>
> >>>> it
> >>>
> >>>> all together into something coherent. Does that sound reasonable to
> >>>>> everyone?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Tyler
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 10:26 AM Kenneth Knowles
> <k...@google.com.invalid
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Very cool! I'm really excited about this integration.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> j...@nanthrax.net>
> >>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Mingmin and I prepared a new branch to have the SQL DSL in dsls/sql
> >>>>>>> location.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Any help is welcome !
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>>> JB
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 04/06/2017 06:36 PM, Mingmin Xu wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> @Tarush, you're very welcome to join the effort.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 7:22 AM, tarush grover <
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> tarushappt...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Can I be also part of this feature development.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>> Tarush Grover
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 3:17 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I compiled BEAM-301 branch with calcite 1.12 - passed.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Julian tries to not break existing things, but he will if
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> there's
> >>>
> >>>> a
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> reason
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> to do so :-)
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Mingmin Xu <mingm...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> @Ted, thanks for the note. I intend to stick with one version,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Beam
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> 0.6.0
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> and Calcite 1.11 so far, unless impacted by API change. Before
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> it's
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> merged
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> back to master, will upgrade to the latest version.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Working in feature branch is good - you may want to
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> periodically
> >>>
> >>>> sync
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> up
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> with master.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I noticed that you are using 1.11.0 of calcite.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 1.12 is out, FYI
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Mingmin Xu <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> mingm...@gmail.com>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm working on https://issues.apache.org/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> jira/browse/BEAM-301(Add
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Beam
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> SQL DSL). The skeleton is already in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/XuMingmin/beam/tree/BEAM-301, using Java
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> SDK
> >>>>
> >>>>> in
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> back-end. The goal is to provide a SQL interface over Beam,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> based
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Calcite, including:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> 1). a translator to create Beam pipeline from SQL,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> (SELECT/INSERT/FILTER/GROUP-BY/JOIN/...);
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2). an interactive client to submit queries;  (All-SQL mode)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 3). a SQL API which reduce the work to create a Pipeline;
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> (Semi-SQL
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> mode)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> As we see many folks are interested in this feature, would
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> like
> >>>
> >>>> to
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> create a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> feature branch to have more involvement.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Looking for comments and feedback.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ----
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Mingmin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>> ----
> >>>>>>>>>>> Mingmin
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> >>>>>>> jbono...@apache.org
> >>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> >>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> ----
> >>>> Mingmin
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> 陈竞,中科院计算技术研究所,高性能计算机中心
> >>> Jing Chen HPCC.ICT.AC China
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > --
> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > jbono...@apache.org
> > http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> ----
> Mingmin
>

Reply via email to