Remaining items for closing this release are:
- Move source distribution from dev repository to release repository in
dist.apache.org
- Finalize the version in JIRA.
- Announce on user@ and other places.

On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 2:07 PM, Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thank you JB.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 11:33 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> This vote passed with only +1.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm promoting the artifacts to central and update Jira.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Are you also pushing the PyPI artifacts? Do you want me to do it?
>>>>
>>>
> Let me know if you want me to push to PyPI.
>

I noticed that the Maven artifacts are published and for parity published
the PyPI packages.


>
>
>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> As I'm in vacation can a committer deal with the tag and website or
>>>>> merge ?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Website PR had errors with dead-links. Re-running the test. If it fails
>>>> again, I can merge and we can fix with a follow up PR.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I noticed that pydocs contents are empty (i.e. headers are in there, but
>>> content is missing) in this PR. I am not sure what caused it. What is the
>>> recommendation here, we can do two things:
>>>
>>> a) Drop this PR, and re-create whole documentation again
>>> b) Merge this PR, and create another PR to fix the pydocs.
>>>
>>
>> This is done. I updated the pydocs while merging it. Pydoc generation
>> worked fine for me, I do not know what was the issue.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I can do the tagging.
>>>>
>>>
> This is also done.
>
>
>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry for this very short e-mail. Thanks all for your vote.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 18, 2017, 18:43, at 18:43, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" <
>>>>> j...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>>>>> >Hi
>>>>> >
>>>>> >I'm in vacation so I'm looking for a decent Internet connection to
>>>>> >finalize the release.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >I keep you posted.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >Regards
>>>>> >JB
>>>>> >
>>>>> >On Aug 18, 2017, 17:48, at 17:48, Eugene Kirpichov
>>>>> ><kirpic...@google.com.INVALID> wrote:
>>>>> >>Hi JB,
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>Any updates on finalizing the release?
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>Thanks.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 5:42 AM Aljoscha Krettek <
>>>>> aljos...@apache.org>
>>>>> >>wrote:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>> (Belated) +1
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>  * verified signatures
>>>>> >>>  * verified that Quickstart works with Flink Runner
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> > On 16. Aug 2017, at 20:41, Robert Bradshaw
>>>>> >><rober...@google.com.INVALID>
>>>>> >>> wrote:
>>>>> >>> >
>>>>> >>> > +1 binding
>>>>> >>> >
>>>>> >>> > (I've been on vacation as well.)
>>>>> >>> >
>>>>> >>> > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Lukasz Cwik
>>>>> >><lc...@google.com.invalid>
>>>>> >>> wrote:
>>>>> >>> >> Back from vacation.
>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>> >>> >> +1 binding
>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>> >>> >> BEAM-2671 has been marked for 2.2.0 release.
>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>> >>> >> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 2:08 AM, Kobi Salant
>>>>> >><kobi.sal...@gmail.com>
>>>>> >>> wrote:
>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>> >>> >>> Hi,
>>>>> >>> >>>
>>>>> >>> >>> Spark runner was tested with word count example and a more
>>>>> >>complex
>>>>> >>> session
>>>>> >>> >>> based application on a yarn cluster.
>>>>> >>> >>> Both application run successfully so we can say that spark
>>>>> >runner
>>>>> >>> passed
>>>>> >>> >>> the sanity tests needed.
>>>>> >>> >>>
>>>>> >>> >>> Still there is an open ticket
>>>>> >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-2671 which Stas is
>>>>> >>working
>>>>> >>> on
>>>>> >>> >>> and its implications should be taken into consideration
>>>>> >regarding
>>>>> >>the
>>>>> >>> >>> release.
>>>>> >>> >>>
>>>>> >>> >>> Regards
>>>>> >>> >>> Kobi
>>>>> >>> >>>
>>>>> >>> >>> 2017-08-16 5:02 GMT+03:00 Eugene Kirpichov
>>>>> >>> <kirpic...@google.com.invalid>:
>>>>> >>> >>>
>>>>> >>> >>>> Hey all,
>>>>> >>> >>>>
>>>>> >>> >>>> Seems like we're missing one more affirmative vote from a PMC
>>>>> >>member
>>>>> >>> (so
>>>>> >>> >>>> far we have JB and Ahmet) to proceed with the release.
>>>>> >>> >>>>
>>>>> >>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 9:30 AM Ahmet Altay
>>>>> >><al...@google.com.invalid
>>>>> >>> >
>>>>> >>> >>>> wrote:
>>>>> >>> >>>>
>>>>> >>> >>>>> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 6:32 AM, Ismaël Mejía
>>>>> >><ieme...@gmail.com>
>>>>> >>> >>> wrote:
>>>>> >>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>> >>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>> >>>>>> - Validated signatures OK
>>>>> >>> >>>>>> - mvn clean verify -Prelease on both OpenJDK 1.7 and Oracle
>>>>> >>JDK 8
>>>>> >>> >>> with
>>>>> >>> >>>>>> the docker development images (WIP), both OK
>>>>> >>> >>>>>> - Run WordCount on local Flink and Spark runners OK
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>> >>>>>> Everything looks nice, only one minor thing (not blocking at
>>>>> >>all).
>>>>> >>> >>> The
>>>>> >>> >>>>>> proto generated files for python are not cleaned correctly
>>>>> >and
>>>>> >>this
>>>>> >>> >>>>>> causes the validation to complain because the maven rat
>>>>> >plugin
>>>>> >>does
>>>>> >>> >>>>>> not find the apache headers on the files  (this happens if
>>>>> >you
>>>>> >>> >>> execute
>>>>> >>> >>>>>> mvn clean verify -Prelease immediately after the
>>>>> validation).
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>> >>>>> Ismaël, could you create a JIRA issue for this (to be fixed
>>>>> at
>>>>> >>a
>>>>> >>> future
>>>>> >>> >>>>> release)?
>>>>> >>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>> >>>>>> On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 6:52 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
>>>>> >>> >>> j...@nanthrax.net
>>>>> >>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>> >>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> I do my own tests and casting my own vote ;)
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> Regards
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> JB
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> On 08/09/2017 07:08 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for the
>>>>> >>version
>>>>> >>> >>>>>> 2.1.0,
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> as follows:
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide
>>>>> specific
>>>>> >>> >>>> comments)
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review,
>>>>> >>which
>>>>> >>> >>>>> includes:
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>>>>> >>> >>>>> dist.apache.org
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint
>>>>> C8282E76
>>>>> >>[3],
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
>>>>> >>Repository
>>>>> >>> >>> [4],
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> * source code tag "v2.1.0-RC3" [5],
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> * website pull request listing the release and publishing
>>>>> >>the API
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> reference manual [6].
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source
>>>>> >>release to
>>>>> >>> >>> the
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> dist.apache.org [2].
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted
>>>>> >>by
>>>>> >>> >>>> majority
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> JB
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
>>>>> >>> >>>>>> projectId=12319527&version=12340528
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.1.0/
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> [4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>> >>> >>>>>> orgapachebeam-1020/
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.1.0-RC3
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/270
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> --
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> jbono...@apache.org
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>> >>> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>> >>>>
>>>>> >>> >>>
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to