On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:

> I believe this release is complete now. Thank you JB for pushing this
> release, and everyone else who contributed to it.
>
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> Remaining items for closing this release are:
>> - Move source distribution from dev repository to release repository in
>> dist.apache.org
>>
>
> Done.
>
>
>> - Finalize the version in JIRA.
>>
>
> Done.
>
>
>> - Announce on user@ and other places.
>>
>
> JB, I think it would be best if you announce this to user@ as the release
> manager. If you do not have time I will send the announcement message
> tomorrow.
>

I sent out the release email to user@. Everyone please feel free promote
the release on other channels.


>
>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 2:07 PM, Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you JB.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 11:33 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
>>>>>> j...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This vote passed with only +1.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm promoting the artifacts to central and update Jira.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you also pushing the PyPI artifacts? Do you want me to do it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> Let me know if you want me to push to PyPI.
>>>
>>
>> I noticed that the Maven artifacts are published and for parity published
>> the PyPI packages.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As I'm in vacation can a committer deal with the tag and website or
>>>>>>> merge ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Website PR had errors with dead-links. Re-running the test. If it
>>>>>> fails again, I can merge and we can fix with a follow up PR.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I noticed that pydocs contents are empty (i.e. headers are in there,
>>>>> but content is missing) in this PR. I am not sure what caused it. What is
>>>>> the recommendation here, we can do two things:
>>>>>
>>>>> a) Drop this PR, and re-create whole documentation again
>>>>> b) Merge this PR, and create another PR to fix the pydocs.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is done. I updated the pydocs while merging it. Pydoc generation
>>>> worked fine for me, I do not know what was the issue.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can do the tagging.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> This is also done.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry for this very short e-mail. Thanks all for your vote.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Aug 18, 2017, 18:43, at 18:43, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" <
>>>>>>> j...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> >Hi
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >I'm in vacation so I'm looking for a decent Internet connection to
>>>>>>> >finalize the release.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >I keep you posted.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >Regards
>>>>>>> >JB
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >On Aug 18, 2017, 17:48, at 17:48, Eugene Kirpichov
>>>>>>> ><kirpic...@google.com.INVALID> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>Hi JB,
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >>Any updates on finalizing the release?
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >>Thanks.
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >>On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 5:42 AM Aljoscha Krettek <
>>>>>>> aljos...@apache.org>
>>>>>>> >>wrote:
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >>> (Belated) +1
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>>  * verified signatures
>>>>>>> >>>  * verified that Quickstart works with Flink Runner
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> > On 16. Aug 2017, at 20:41, Robert Bradshaw
>>>>>>> >><rober...@google.com.INVALID>
>>>>>>> >>> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>> >
>>>>>>> >>> > +1 binding
>>>>>>> >>> >
>>>>>>> >>> > (I've been on vacation as well.)
>>>>>>> >>> >
>>>>>>> >>> > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Lukasz Cwik
>>>>>>> >><lc...@google.com.invalid>
>>>>>>> >>> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>> >> Back from vacation.
>>>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>>>> >>> >> +1 binding
>>>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>>>> >>> >> BEAM-2671 has been marked for 2.2.0 release.
>>>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>>>> >>> >> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 2:08 AM, Kobi Salant
>>>>>>> >><kobi.sal...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> >>> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>>>> >>> >>> Hi,
>>>>>>> >>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> >>> Spark runner was tested with word count example and a more
>>>>>>> >>complex
>>>>>>> >>> session
>>>>>>> >>> >>> based application on a yarn cluster.
>>>>>>> >>> >>> Both application run successfully so we can say that spark
>>>>>>> >runner
>>>>>>> >>> passed
>>>>>>> >>> >>> the sanity tests needed.
>>>>>>> >>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> >>> Still there is an open ticket
>>>>>>> >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-2671 which Stas
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>> >>working
>>>>>>> >>> on
>>>>>>> >>> >>> and its implications should be taken into consideration
>>>>>>> >regarding
>>>>>>> >>the
>>>>>>> >>> >>> release.
>>>>>>> >>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> >>> Regards
>>>>>>> >>> >>> Kobi
>>>>>>> >>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> >>> 2017-08-16 5:02 GMT+03:00 Eugene Kirpichov
>>>>>>> >>> <kirpic...@google.com.invalid>:
>>>>>>> >>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> >>>> Hey all,
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>> >>>> Seems like we're missing one more affirmative vote from a
>>>>>>> PMC
>>>>>>> >>member
>>>>>>> >>> (so
>>>>>>> >>> >>>> far we have JB and Ahmet) to proceed with the release.
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 9:30 AM Ahmet Altay
>>>>>>> >><al...@google.com.invalid
>>>>>>> >>> >
>>>>>>> >>> >>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 6:32 AM, Ismaël Mejía
>>>>>>> >><ieme...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> >>> >>> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>> - Validated signatures OK
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>> - mvn clean verify -Prelease on both OpenJDK 1.7 and
>>>>>>> Oracle
>>>>>>> >>JDK 8
>>>>>>> >>> >>> with
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>> the docker development images (WIP), both OK
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>> - Run WordCount on local Flink and Spark runners OK
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>> Everything looks nice, only one minor thing (not blocking
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> >>all).
>>>>>>> >>> >>> The
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>> proto generated files for python are not cleaned correctly
>>>>>>> >and
>>>>>>> >>this
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>> causes the validation to complain because the maven rat
>>>>>>> >plugin
>>>>>>> >>does
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>> not find the apache headers on the files  (this happens if
>>>>>>> >you
>>>>>>> >>> >>> execute
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>> mvn clean verify -Prelease immediately after the
>>>>>>> validation).
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>> Ismaël, could you create a JIRA issue for this (to be
>>>>>>> fixed at
>>>>>>> >>a
>>>>>>> >>> future
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>> release)?
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>> On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 6:52 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
>>>>>>> >>> >>> j...@nanthrax.net
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> I do my own tests and casting my own vote ;)
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> On 08/09/2017 07:08 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> >>version
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>> 2.1.0,
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> as follows:
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide
>>>>>>> specific
>>>>>>> >>> >>>> comments)
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review,
>>>>>>> >>which
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>> includes:
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>> dist.apache.org
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint
>>>>>>> C8282E76
>>>>>>> >>[3],
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
>>>>>>> >>Repository
>>>>>>> >>> >>> [4],
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> * source code tag "v2.1.0-RC3" [5],
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> * website pull request listing the release and
>>>>>>> publishing
>>>>>>> >>the API
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> reference manual [6].
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source
>>>>>>> >>release to
>>>>>>> >>> >>> the
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> dist.apache.org [2].
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is
>>>>>>> adopted
>>>>>>> >>by
>>>>>>> >>> >>>> majority
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>> projectId=12319527&version=12340528
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.1.0/
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>> dist/release/beam/KEYS
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> [4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>> orgapachebeam-1020/
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.1.0-RC3
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/270
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> jbono...@apache.org
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>
>>>>>>> >>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to