Both issues are particular cases. Can the 2.2.0 be out and a 2.2.1 done
quickly after? Would be very appreciated to have the 2.2.0 fixes to not
depend on snapshots anymore due to some blockers found in the core of
previous releases.


Le 10 nov. 2017 21:23, "Chamikara Jayalath" <chamik...@google.com.invalid>
a écrit :

> We found another issue that should probably be fixed in 2.2.0 release:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3172
>
> A fix is out for review and will be merged soon.
>
> Thanks,
> Cham
>
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 10:43 AM Eugene Kirpichov
> <kirpic...@google.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately I think I found a data loss bug - it was there since 2.0.0
> > but I think it's serious enough that delaying a fix until the next
> release
> > would be irresponsible.
> > See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3169
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:57 PM Robert Bradshaw
> <rober...@google.com.invalid
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Our release notes look like nothing more than a query for the closed
> > > jira issues. Do we have a top-level summary to highlight the big
> > > ticket items in the release? And in particular somewhere to mention
> > > that this is likely the last release to support Java 7 that'll get
> > > widely read?
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Reuven Lax <re...@google.com.invalid>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > This RC is currently failing on a number of validation steps, so we
> > need
> > > to
> > > > cut at least one more RC. Fingers crossed that it will be the last
> one.
> > > >
> > > > Reuven
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Konstantinos Katsiapis <
> > > > katsia...@google.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Just a remark: Release of Tensorflow Transform
> > > >> <https://github.com/tensorflow/transform> 0.4.0 depends on release
> of
> > > >> Apache Beam 2.2.0 so upvoting for a release (the sooner the better).
> > > >>
> > > >> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Reuven Lax <re...@google.com.invalid
> >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Are we waiting for any more validation of this candidate? If
> people
> > > are
> > > >> > still running tests I'll hold off on RC4 (to reduce the chance of
> an
> > > >> RC5),
> > > >> > otherwise I'll cut RC4 once Valentyn's PR is merged.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Reuven
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Valentyn Tymofieiev <
> > > >> > valen...@google.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/4109 is out to address both
> > > >> > findings I
> > > >> > > reported earlier.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 8:54 AM, Etienne Chauchot <
> > > echauc...@gmail.com>
> > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > Just as a remark, I compared (on my laptop though) queries
> > > execution
> > > >> > > times
> > > >> > > > on my previous run of 2.2.0-RC3 with release 2.1.0 and I did
> not
> > > see
> > > >> > any
> > > >> > > > performance regression.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Best
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Etienne
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Le 09/11/2017 à 03:13, Valentyn Tymofieiev a écrit :
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >> I looked at Python side of Dataflow & Direct runners on
> Linux.
> > > There
> > > >> > are
> > > >> > > >> two findings:
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> 1. One of the mobile gaming examples did not pass for
> Dataflow
> > > >> runner,
> > > >> > > >> addressed in: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/4102
> > > >> > > >> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapa
> > > >> > > >> che%2Fbeam%2Fpull%2F4102&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNF3OS6Oo-MeNET
> > > >> > > >> CCmOxJj5Gm2uH6g>
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> .
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> 2. Python streaming did not work for Dataflow runner, one PR
> is
> > > out
> > > >> > > >> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/4106, but follow up PRs
> > may
> > > be
> > > >> > > >> required
> > > >> > > >> as we continue to investigate. If we had a PostCommit tests
> > suite
> > > >> > > running
> > > >> > > >> against a release branch, this could have been caught
> earlier.
> > > Filed
> > > >> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3163.
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Reuven Lax
> > > <re...@google.com.invalid
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> Hi everyone,
> > > >> > > >>>
> > > >> > > >>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for the
> > > version
> > > >> > > 2.2.0,
> > > >> > > >>> as follows:
> > > >> > > >>>    [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > >> > > >>>    [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide
> specific
> > > >> > > comments)
> > > >> > > >>>
> > > >> > > >>>
> > > >> > > >>> The complete staging area is available for your review,
> which
> > > >> > includes:
> > > >> > > >>>    * JIRA release notes [1],
> > > >> > > >>>    * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
> > > >> > > >>> dist.apache.org
> > > >> > > >>> [2],
> > > >> > > >>> which is signed with the key with fingerprint B98B7708 [3],
> > > >> > > >>>    * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
> > > Repository
> > > >> > [4],
> > > >> > > >>>    * source code tag "v2.2.0-RC3" [5],
> > > >> > > >>>    * website pull request listing the release and publishing
> > the
> > > >> API
> > > >> > > >>> reference manual [6].
> > > >> > > >>>    * Java artifacts were built with Maven 3.5.0 and
> > > OpenJDK/Oracle
> > > >> > JDK
> > > >> > > >>> 1.8.0_144.
> > > >> > > >>>    * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source
> > > release to
> > > >> > the
> > > >> > > >>> dist.apache.org [2].
> > > >> > > >>>
> > > >> > > >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted
> by
> > > >> > majority
> > > >> > > >>> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> > > >> > > >>>
> > > >> > > >>> Thanks,
> > > >> > > >>> Reuven
> > > >> > > >>>
> > > >> > > >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?p
> > > >> > > >>> rojectId=12319527&version=12341044
> > > >> > > >>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.2.0/
> > > >> > > >>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
> > > >> > > >>> [4]
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
> > > >> > > >>> beam-1023/
> > > >> > > >>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.2.0-RC3
> > > >> > > >>> <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.2.0-RC3>
> > > >> > > >>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/337
> > > >> > > >>>
> > > >> > > >>>
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Gus Katsiapis | Software Engineer | katsia...@google.com |
> > 650-918-7487 <(650)%20918-7487>
> > > <(650)%20918-7487>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to