This is awesome!

With three SDKs the Beam portability vision will have a lot to offer.

Kenn

On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Robert Bradshaw <rober...@google.com>
wrote:

> Very Exciting!
>
> The Go language is in a very different point of the design space than
> either Java or Python; it's interesting to see how you've explored
> making this fit with the Beam model. Thanks for the detailed design
> doc.
>
> +1 to targeting the portability framework directly. Once all runners
> are upgraded to use this too it'll just work everywhere.
>
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
> wrote:
> > Hi Henning,
> >
> > Thanks for the update, that's great !
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> > On 12/01/2017 12:40 AM, Henning Rohde wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi everyone,
> >>
> >>   We have been prototyping a Go SDK for Beam for some time and have
> >> reached a point, where we think this effort might be of interest to the
> >> wider Beam community and would benefit from being developed in a proper
> >> feature branch. We have prepared a PR to that end:
> >>
> >> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/4200
> >>
> >> Please note that the prototype supports batch only, for now, and
> includes
> >> various examples that run on the Go direct runner. Go would be the
> first SDK
> >> targeting the portability framework exclusively and our plan is to
> extend
> >> and benefit from that ecosystem.
> >>
> >> We have also prepared an RFC document with the initial design,
> motivations
> >> and tradeoffs made:
> >>
> >> https://s.apache.org/beam-go-sdk-design-rfc
> >> <https://s.apache.org/beam-go-sdk-design-rfc>
> >>
> >> The challenge is that Go is quite a tricky language for Beam due to
> >> various limitations, notably strong typing w/o generics, and so the
> >> approaches taken by Java and Python do not readily apply.
> >>
> >> Of course, neither the prototype nor the design are in any way final --
> >> there are many open questions and we absolutely welcome ideas and
> >> contributions. Please let us know if you have any comments or
> objections (or
> >> would like to help!).
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>   Henning Rohde, Bill Neubauer, and Robert Burke
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > jbono...@apache.org
> > http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > Talend - http://www.talend.com
>

Reply via email to