So I've been hesistant to do large chunks of Python 3 reviews for the same
reason I've been hesistant to do large chunks of Python 3 work (on the
commit side seems to move more slowly than the devs), but I suppose that
does become somewhat of a self fulfilling prophecy. I'll dedicate some more
cycles to helping with the reviews :)

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 1:49 PM, Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:

> Thank you Holden for doing this work. I agree with Robert's comment. I
> know there are a few folks working on this now (you, @luke-zhu and
> @cclauss). Perhaps you could do python 3 related code reviews within that
> group. I would be happy to chime in and review some chunks as well.
>
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 4:54 PM, Robert Bradshaw <rober...@google.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I'd really like to see Python 3 support sooner rather than later, and
>> have been reviewing some (simple) PRs in this direction. As long as
>> they're broken up into small enough chunks, feel free to send some my
>> way.
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 3:59 PM, Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Y'all,
>> >
>> > I'm trying to make some progress on Python 3 support for Beam but I'm
>> having
>> > a bit of difficulty finding people with review bandwidth. Are there any
>> > committers with time to spare who would be willing to work on this? If
>> not
>> > no worries I'll refocus my efforts elsewhere :)
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> >
>> > Holden :)
>> >
>> > --
>> > Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau
>>
>
>


-- 
Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau

Reply via email to