I'm not a committer, but willing to help review and On Thu, Feb 22, 2018, 8:54 PM Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca> wrote:
> So I've been hesistant to do large chunks of Python 3 reviews for the same > reason I've been hesistant to do large chunks of Python 3 work (on the > commit side seems to move more slowly than the devs), but I suppose that > does become somewhat of a self fulfilling prophecy. I'll dedicate some more > cycles to helping with the reviews :) > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 1:49 PM, Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote: > >> Thank you Holden for doing this work. I agree with Robert's comment. I >> know there are a few folks working on this now (you, @luke-zhu and >> @cclauss). Perhaps you could do python 3 related code reviews within that >> group. I would be happy to chime in and review some chunks as well. >> >> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 4:54 PM, Robert Bradshaw <rober...@google.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I'd really like to see Python 3 support sooner rather than later, and >>> have been reviewing some (simple) PRs in this direction. As long as >>> they're broken up into small enough chunks, feel free to send some my >>> way. >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 3:59 PM, Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca> >>> wrote: >>> > Hi Y'all, >>> > >>> > I'm trying to make some progress on Python 3 support for Beam but I'm >>> having >>> > a bit of difficulty finding people with review bandwidth. Are there any >>> > committers with time to spare who would be willing to work on this? If >>> not >>> > no worries I'll refocus my efforts elsewhere :) >>> > >>> > Cheers, >>> > >>> > Holden :) >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau >>> >> >> > > > -- > Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau > -- Got feedback? go/pabloem-feedback
